Out of all of William's pieces that we read, "The Young Housewife" was by far my favorite. William's writing style, with a hint of mystery and scandal, drew me in and captured my attention all while leaving plenty of room for me to form my own conclusions about various situations. Peter Baker points out exactly what I am referring to in his analytical piece about "The Young Housewife." He states, "One must do a sort of double-take to figure out how the speaker could know this if she is behind the walls of a house." We see the passing doctor detailing seductive features about the young housewife, specifically her attire. As the reader, we learn that the young women is adorned in a sheer negligee; most certainly an object of sensuality.
We also witness the doctor approaching her as almost untouchable. He references her with such regard that we are initially under the impression that he feels insignificant next to her and that she is just a mere wish that he could never obtain. However, as we read farther, I stumbled upon the idea that he had already had her. He uses such detail and describes such perfect images, I came to believe that he had first hand knowledge of these things, and that he hadn't just merely observed them from behind "wood walls. Barry Ahearn accredits this situation by stating, "The encounter between the passing doctor and the young housewife is scrupulously polite and legitimate. Yet the poem hints at potential sexual contact." After completing the piece, I eventually concluded that his "scrupulously polite" descriptions were almost a game, or a fantasy, of the doctor's. I believe that he had certainly seen the housewife, and the negligee, up close.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

1 comment:
Jennifer,
You've done a good job contextualizing the quotations from secondary sources by providing the name of the critic and a paraphrase of the point you want your reader to pay attention to. Instead of saying "his analytical piece" in reference to Baker, you could use the name of his book (cited at the bottom of the excerpt) or the web site you got the excerpt from.
It seems like you disagree with Barry Ahearn, but you don't unpack his quotation and explicitly state your counterargument. You don't have to take a critic's word as truth; if you disagree or have a different reading that is often more interesting than when you agree with another critic. But you want to make sure you explain what was significant to you in the critic's reading of the poem, and then develop your own reading in contrast to the one you've cited. After you quote Ahearn, for example, you could include a sentence explaining what you find compelling about his argument--why you chose to include his observation in your essay.
Kelly
Post a Comment